AI DataCenter Law
INDEPENDENT RESEARCH · LAW / ENERGY / INFRASTRUCTUREUS × CHINA   /   FIELDNOTES No. 01
← LAW

Source commentary
EDITORIAL DRAFT · SEPTEMBER 2026

Co-located load and non-standard interconnection terms

189 FERC ¶ 61,078 · historical order commentary

Scope of this record

This entry concerns the FERC order of 1 November 2024, rather than every subsequent proceeding. It reviews PJM’s proposed amendment to the Susquehanna interconnection agreement, including an increase in co-located load from 300 MW to 480 MW.

Why read it?

The focus is the justification required for non-standard terms and the review of private arrangements under public grid rules. The original order is linked as a traceable record; any assessment of the project’s current position requires later orders and agreements.

Questions for the record

  • Who proposed the amendment, and what role does each agreement party perform?
  • Which terms depart from the standard agreement, and what justification was offered?
  • Which questions did the order resolve, and which did it leave open?

Sources & documents

Follow the evidence

Follow the forces
behind AI.

A considered note on the infrastructure that makes intelligence possible. A research summary every other Wednesday, after editorial review.

One argument. Three developments worth reading. New research, original documents and corrections—with the evidence attached.

RSS / Email ↗Leave your email to receive the reviewed summary. Prefer a feed reader? The RSS feed is available on the subscription page.

A conversation in the margins.

0 / 500 characters

Comments are visible to readers of this site. Please keep your message within 500 characters.